China Development Must Win the Right to Speak
|
China has its own advantages words, should be promptly converted into international discourse; academic support is an important channel to win the right to speak
On China's image abroad, to be cured in the West there is the problem, but it seems difficult to change, such as the U.S. media reports concerning China, the Chinese identified from time to time in the world to plunder resources, or blame the poor quality of Chinese products, or that China With the growth of its national strength has become increasingly arrogant and so on. A country in the implementation of public diplomacy in the process, often face a problem that is very effective in the country in the international transmission of information may not be capable of performing the same mission. China is to implement public diplomacy, with special attention to its information transmission and information content in the end is what? Ordinary people against the West and the political elite, apparently using different words should be the practice of public diplomacy.
First, the core of the right to speak of power, the end-result is power. In the international community, we can take the initiative to set the issue, and guide people look at the problem from our point of view, access to the right to speak. Also to consider the perfection of their own words, if the word itself is a complete system, logical, then it is easy to convince people. Second, the discourse in the international community at what location and structure is also very important. For China, on the one hand to improve the quality of discourse, on the other hand to improve China's international status in the discourse structure. China has been studying and stressed with international standards, such as the introduction of "globalization", "global governance", and many other internationally accepted concept.
It should be noted, China has its own advantages words, just not in time into international discourse. For example, Barack Obama, "world without nuclear weapons" point of view of the international stir, but in fact, China has always advocated the world to eliminate nuclear weapons, but similar views for years without due attention by the international community. This is because the international media of bias, on the other hand is the lack of academic discourse theoretical support. Western words are often based on academic research, such as the clash of civilizations and so on, so from the policy is not to be critical of the efforts of the.
China has formulated the rules of international issues and international capacity is limited, in most cases the performance of the response of Western discourse, which is a structural weakness. Of course, this structural weakness, and international background. Such as the 20th century, 60 years, many countries in the learning time, China's revolutionary discourse. In the 21st century, we need to build a new international influence of the discourse, you need this in depth. |
|
Author Resource:-
Chris Holigan a professianl writer from , it provides the high quality products, such as Electronic Cigarette, Video Camera Watch, and many more.
|
By :
Jessie Stone
Submitted
2010-12-11 16:16:08 |
Article From Article Mayhem
 Ezine ready view |
|
|
|
Related Articles
|
|
|
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")