Article mayhem
   
Nav Menu
select
home
select
Sign up
select
Login
select
Submit Articles
select
Submission Guidelines
select
Top Articles
select
Link Directory
select
About Us
select
Contact Us
select
Privacy Policy
select
RSS Feeds
 
Categories

Accessories
Arts
Business
Cars and Trucks
CGI
Coding Sites
Computers
Cooking
Crafts
Current Affairs
Databases
Entertainment
Film
Finances
Gardening
Healthy Living
Holidays
Home
Internet
Medical
Men Only
Motorcyles
Our Pets
Outdoors
Relationships
Religion
Self Improvement
Sports
Staying Fit
Technology
Travel
Web Design
Weddings
Women Only
Writing
 
Stats
Total Articles: 519629
Total Authors: 142199
Total Downloads: 20359322


Newest Member
Patrick Winter

 


   

A rose by any other name


A study was performed to determine average inhaled carbon dioxide (F(I)CO2) concentrations of multiple respirators using unmanned test methods, and to compare results among test procedures to determine whether they could be used interchangeably. Respirator experiments were performed according to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)(NF(I)CO2), standard European (ENF(I)CO2), and a modified method of the European test (BF(I)CO2) using full-facepiece air-purifying respirators and one air-purifying escape respirator. Bland-Altman statistics for determination of limits of agreement were applied to assess agreement among the various test methods. A considerable lack of agreement was found between NF(I)CO2 and ENF(I)CO2 methods and between BF(I)CO2 and NF(I)CO2 methods for average F(I)CO2. The modified EN136 method produced F(I)CO2 averages about 0.13% to 0.23% above unmodified EN136 values, but the agreement between methods was generally acceptable. These results demonstrate that NIOSH and European unmanned test methods for determining respirator average F(I)CO2 concentrations produce different results for like respirators. However, the findings suggest that the ENF(I)CO2 and BF(I)CO2 unmanned methods could be used interchangeably for quantifying respirator F(I)CO2 concentrations.

Leakage from loose-fitting PAPRs (powered air-purifying respirators) can compromise the safety of wearers. The Martindale Centurion MAX multifunction PAPR is a loose-fitting PAPR that also incorporates head, eye, and ear protection. This respirator is used in mines where coal dust usually is controlled by ventilation systems. Should the respirator be depended on for significant respiratory protection? Ten human volunteers were asked to wear the Centurion MAX inside a fog-filled chamber. Their inhalation flow rates were measured with small pitot-tube flowmeters held inside their mouths. They were video imaged while they breathed deeply, and the points at which the fog reached their mouths were determined. Results showed that an average of 1.1 L could be inhaled before contaminated air reached the mouth. As long as the blower purges contamination from inside the face piece during exhalation, the 1.1 L acts as a buffer against contaminants leaked due to overbreathing of blower flow rate.



Author Resource:- Dexter Season 6 Episode 1 Megavideo or Watch Dexter Season 6 Episode 1 Megavideo

[Valid RSS feed]  Category Rss Feed - http://www.articlemayhem.com/rss.php?rss=248
By : Abdul Lahanah    19 or more times read
Submitted 2011-10-01 22:00:06
Article From Article Mayhem

ezine ready view Ezine ready view

Related Articles

 
 


[Valid RSS feed]