The standards of food is different from internal and external
|
Our food standards referred to "inside and outside has"
Food exports and domestic food qualified rate of super 99.8 per cent in 90%; Food safety accidents PinChu exposure food standards lag etc
One side is foreign think unsafe relevant departments, the other side is not supranational standard, newly response happening "nestle infant rice incident," reignite consumers at home and abroad for food "dual" standard confused. Similar food standards "inside and outside the phenomenon of" is not a rare different. To this, the expert thinks, China's food standards to international standards and confirm where possible "to strictly".
S phenomenon
First-class products export second-rate domestic products
Data shows, years since China's food exports all maintained in qualified 99.8 percent above, and domestic food in "years under the background of shake-up, percent of pass is only 90 percent or so. Although only nine percentage points, but the gap expose food safety standards "inside and outside the embarrassment of different".
Experts point out that, on the one hand, China's food needs to "touch high" can enter foreign markets, cause "first-class products export, second-rate domestic products".
On the other hand, in broad standard produce "depression" effect, some in foreign identified as "unqualified" foreign food, can openly enter the Chinese market. Some products were found in abroad, after China security problems facing the question, but public because of Chinese low standards and often "insolent".
Shanghai dairy industry association deputy secretary-general CaoMing mean, for some countries, food safety standards like "technical barriers", is to protect their own country industry "tool". "The European Union is almost international recognized for food safety requirements of the most stringent region, China's production of dairy products hard to enter the European Union and the United States, and standard strict market."
Experts suggest, in economic society changes today, still holding the standard, is behind KeZhouQiuJian ". And concoct technology that pattern renovates ceaselessly, some areas compared the standard lag, also caused regulatory weakness, let outlaws drill a loophole.
Case 1
According to reports, research institutions from Sweden the data show that the brand such as production part of the nestle baby food contains arsenic, lead, and other heavy metals are unsafe.
【 response 】
China's center for disease control bulletin, these brands of products detected in China and other heavy metals arsenic, lead, all did not exceed China standards.
Case 2
McDonald's in 2010 in the U.S. was found chicken mallard containing two chemical composition, "inception" and methyl poly two "special butyl hydroquinone".
【 response 】
McDonald's China company says, this two kinds of material content are consistent with current China hygiene standards for use of food additives.
Case 3
For example, in raw milk per milliliter our standard provisions shall not exceed 200 million bacteria content, but this is a standard in the world aren't recognized; Be like again, international standards of somatic "cow" test items, this is the important judge whether healthy cattle, and China has no standards and relevant regulations.
【 statement 】
Shanghai dairy industry association deputy secretary-general, said China CaoMing is for dairy and other food industry inspection standard, do exist in advanced countries with international standards are different, some indexes of lower than other countries.
Case 4
China allowed "agriculture residual" than the European Union and the United States amount to several times higher; Margarines, by exposure in China is harmful, but the standard of set limit to no mandatory; "False" incident fraudsters propolis add rutin in gum, quercetin etc flavonoids substances, artificial raised the flavonoids content, instead "conform to the national standard" propolis...
S agent for
"Some standard twenty or thirty years constant"
An inescapable fact is, frequent food safety accidents in China, often exposed behind food safety management system standard quality is not high, lag problem.
Our standardization method in 1989, the situation has started to implement changes the revision work, standardization method in the recent ten years, now the new law is still not come. The standardized law implementing regulations also clearly stipulates: standard after carrying out, the formulation of standards department shall, according to the development of science and technology and economic construction need timely re-examination.
Standard review cycles are usually not more than five years.
"Unfortunately, some standard long-term 'piaffe', even twenty or thirty years changeless, not only give some fraudulent enterprise loophole provides may, also affect the vital interests of the people and even national image." Chinese consumer society QiuBaoChang legal counsel colonel said.
Enterprise often sponsorship food standards
"Standard for the interests of strife." is Chinese consumer society, often QiuBaoChang attorneys said, a low standard, there are lots of enterprises are put in, the standard taller, some production capacity of the enterprise is behind will be eliminated. And some of our standard exactly is to yield a few backward enterprise.
QiuBaoChang explained, our country were tens of thousands of a standard, when developing criteria is generally low. On the other hand, make a standard, need a lot of data collection and argumentation, cost is higher, and this subsidy is limited, many state spending is often corporate sponsors, one is the "update" slow, 2 it is blended with enterprise's "will", some enterprise became low standard beneficiaries.
S view
"Standards should remove enterprise voices"
How to improve and enhance our food standards? In QiuBaoChang looks, it is imperative to "standards should remove enterprise voice," the national level organization have credibility by industry experts etc participation, transparent process.
"Since is food safety standards, can't 'different' internal and external to the international standard, should emulate, possibly to strictly." QiuBaoChang said, raise the standard, is the life and health of the people responsible for participation in the world, China is the need of economic division.
Food standards rise, still should change make out, not unified problems conflicting.
In addition, still should develop higher standard of third party agencies early warning role. Experts suggest the government establishing incentive mechanism, and third-party organizations and companies formed between risk early warning network, construct linkage mechanism, in food safety management master initiative.
|
|
Author Resource:-
I'm xia zihui from http://www.smallinjectionmachine.com,small-sized plastic molding machine Manufacturer, plastic injection machine,
|
By :
Jessie Stone
Submitted
2011-04-25 02:46:16 |
Article From Article Mayhem
 Ezine ready view |
|
|
|
Related Articles
|
|
|
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")