Who is the better represent for Internet trends: WEB, or P2P?
|
The WEB is dead, the Internet eternal life "technical judgment fact contradictions exist logic and already dead, WEB technology, and can't necessarily judge that they think are business judgment. "Close business will account for wins open technology" judgment was not set up. Therefore, we want to restore the facts.
Someone puts forward such a strange question: if no WEB, our world what changes will happen? No WEB world are?
This problem is obviously by the attachment of the article that controversial article "WEB was dead, Internet eternal life" and cause. As the Internet WEB and P2P internal two different calculation mode, already dead, as saying the WEB will become protagonist said P2P.
I believe that the future of the Internet world, is platform concentrated calculation and terminal combination of scattered calculation world; Mapping to business, is open and value-added service charge platform with world; Economically, it's mass synergies with personalized manufacturing organic combination of the world.
1, problems context
Not too precise, WEB more representative concentration, P2P more representative scattered. Say no WEB world, equivalent to say no centralized world, it and said no, like scattered world is unthinkable.
The WEB is dead, with the attachment of Internet life magazine consistent exaggerated style. The proposition to objective appraisal, we first need to put this question context and the media scientific context to see, understanding problems distinguish background.
From the media want to exaggerate the sense, the WEB has to death this proposition, the actual want to increase rendering, is mobile Internet and desktop Internet this case gluttony trend. But the article says WEB was dead, use is not accurate media language, if want to accurately understand, at least to differentiate the following conflicting meaning:
Firstly, the article would like to emphasize that maybe, desktop Internet rely mainly on the WEB mode, and the mobile Internet rely more on P2P mode. Now more and more people go online via mobile phones, and through a computer terminal browser share of less. In this sense, the WEB was dead, equal to say, cell phone has already grown up, instead of PC leading Internet.
Another might want to emphasize is: WEB focuses on server mode, and the P2P focuses on end-to-end model. Already dead, may say WEB in parables in mobile Internet internal, like WAP such reliance on server model will decline, and use P2P such terminal calculation mode will prevail. But the question is, provide statistical figure from the same view, P2P and the WEB in a downward trend. Real growth is video. While there are now nearly P2P mode, but the video said the socialization and not listed them as P2P among. To say, more accord with this argument is Java this local calculation mode. And the combination of JAVA and P2P is indeed a trend. But the article whether to support Java was suspect.
The third likely emphasis, is with a second possibility opposite aspects: P2P as a private method, and WEB this open way than, the article thinks that private service will replace the open service, becomes the Internet trends. He said "we are gradually abandon open and free Web, find a more simple, stylish, use up more comfortable service". This with Anderson consistent thoughts, especially the "free" thoughts are contradictory. But at least the article already dead, Internet WEB eternal glory of the Ipad, ghost is the semi-closed mode. This is a kind of and Java opposite trend.
In "abandon open and free" the Internet weekly, with the attachment "on this issue was the opposite, and multiple views of postings mainstream American opinion popular at that time. Now, we have the vision. We won't because short-term performance impact by apple, and in this principle vacillating. The more deadly is a case, this paper the inner contradictions. P2P is the tendency of private calculation, but its main application such as SKYPE, BT, music sharing, PPTV etc is open. This and apple's components, although pay attention to the terminal, but it is calculated things. And apple charging patterns (such as through iTunes), not very WEB?
Then, the article "WEB is dead", except that the proportion of sites in Internet field in the decline of the simple fact behind how much some fuzzy logic technology. However, one thing is for certain, "WEB is dead" is not equal to the WEB did not exist, it is just the WEB is no longer a metaphor, from statistical figure on look, it is still in massive existence. If the WEB is to "does not exist" degree, estimates that even the adversary -- phone also does not exist. Because humans will enter for the human body to the retina display combining carbon computation and communication of the era.
"WEB is dead" true meaning, practical hints at what caused by technology, open, it will eventually be commercial power back to the closed: "after long journey, we may also fell back". The attachment "article more open Google and closed apple say:" in fact, through which to Google, iTunes, jobs and the way traditional media refused to work closely with Google's open. In distributed mode, nearly all men can in any site to release advertisement, and Google may benefit from its profit from public. For apple, as long as someone buy the film or song, it can be profitable, its profits and traditional content providers are closely linked." This is in the hint: emerging and open technology with traditional and closed, the latter will meet the business is the winner. And the dominance was mobile WEB domination of alternative, is the turning point of the turning point.
Therefore, this became the technology trends of Internet business trends with a fundamental judgments.
Personally, I think the attachment of the existing technical judgment of logic and in fact contradiction, WEB dead technical judgement, and must not necessarily export they want to draw the business judgment. Closed commercial accounts of open technology judgment victory is not set up. Therefore, we want to restore the facts.
|
|
Author Resource:-
My name is xia zihui from ,China Ladies Leather Shoulder Bags, Ladies Leather Hand Bags, Women Leather Messenger Bags .
|
By :
Jessie Stone
Submitted
2011-04-19 10:50:54 |
Article From Article Mayhem
 Ezine ready view |
|
|
|
Related Articles
|
|
|
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")