Consumer's camera maintenance after missing three times
|
Consumer camera maintenance after missing three times. WuHanCheng defendant Fuji company
A few days ago, Fuji film (China) investment Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Fuji company) and its subordinate a certain type of products vendors, manufacturers, such as specified WeiXiuShang will concurrently website in the dock. The case will be on March 11 in wuhan formally in session. Camera maintenance after missing three times ","
Yesterday (March 7), Fuji camera buyers WeiYuHui told the daily economic news reporters, he was 29 June 2008 at wuhan a digital camera accessories business institution flower 1900 yuan to buy a model for S1000fd of Fuji digital camera (fuselage Numbers: 8SW03051). Article 3 days, lens appear sometimes cannot telescopic situation, and the screen shows "zoom mistakes," the words. He that year August will question camera sent Fuji designated Shanghai acute digital technology Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as "Shanghai acute Angle) maintenance.
"After two months, I received the camera after finding remains a problem, they asked me again put the camera sent to Shanghai maintenance." WeiYuHui says, in the middle of October, camera back his hand, "this time the maintenance and replacement of the camera top cover component". After that, he released by Fuji company website camera performance fault firmware upgrade to inform, camera updated, "but there are still pixels highlights and serious, macro filming cannot focus or focus prohibit to wait for a problem."
Representations made, camera was again request sent to Japan detection. "Japanese Fuji film electronic image division, quality assurance department done detect the report has proved problem exists, test report also specify can't solve the problem." WeiYuHui said.
The end of December, 2010 Shanghai WeiYuHui received from acute letter: "you suggested going back to you for sending me the S1000 machine, we after many search, this machine has been unable to find S1000 camera. I direction you apologize."
"I found on the Internet and I do have a lot of consumer, they encountered and their contact decided to bring Fuji and related aspects together to court. Lawyer: camera title to consumer things happen, Fuji company and related aspects also took remedial measures. Issued by the Shanghai acute Angle in a letter, the reporter sees as follows words: "in order to guarantee that you can use in machine detecting during the camera, 2009 August 6, my company send you a S1000 follow-up type, type: S1500 (serial number: 9UW05378), as backup machine for you. Our staff by telephone, inform you have to change planes S1500 is using the disposal methods, but unfortunately you did not inform whether agree."
For the remedial measures and WeiYuHui said: "I didn't put forward this requirement, they put (spare machine) directly addressed to me. I wonder why don't give me S1000 models of spare machine." According to his introduction, Shanghai acute mailed to his S1500 camera "only for a LuoJi, even the lens cover all have no, now also is broken."
The daily economic news reporter call Fuji company Shanghai headquarters, wiring researchers said, related department manager in the company. As Fuji companies in China, Shanghai WeiXiuShang designated camera acute digital technology Co., LTD, legal representative CengGuiBao when accepting a reporter to interview: "there is this matter, the lawyer will to conother things related arrangements." As for concrete circumstance and later plan, he says, "is now a lawsuit, to this thing no comment."
WeiYuHui free attorney, hubei better and more beautiful qiqi lawyer told reporters: "no matter what the problem is, that part a camera ownership belongs to consumers, the businessman has no right to make any treatment for a camera ownership, must be returned to the consumers. He stressed that, in this case, "the problem of the camera is the key evidence." In addition, the more beautiful qiqi said: "whether the defendant constitute a cover-up, misleading and fraud consumer behavior, believe the court will have fair judgement."
For Fuji under camera arise problems, a digital insiders told the daily economic news reporter: "and Canon, nikon, as Japanese brands such as SONY, compared to Fuji camera in market share and new product launch aspects to have the certain disparity." He says, Fuji camera relative business not outstanding, "probably with company's overall strategy transformation
Consumer camera maintenance after missing three times. WuHanCheng defendant Fuji company
2011-03-08 08:58:57 LiuXiaoJie big in small comment
Every reporter LiuXiaoJie from wuhan by
A few days ago, Fuji film (China) investment Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Fuji company) and its subordinate a certain type of products vendors, manufacturers, such as specified WeiXiuShang will concurrently website in the dock. The case will be on March 11 in wuhan formally in session. Camera maintenance after missing three times ","
Yesterday (March 7), Fuji camera buyers WeiYuHui told the daily economic news reporters, he was 29 June 2008 at wuhan a digital camera accessories business institution flower 1900 yuan to buy a model for S1000fd of Fuji digital camera (fuselage Numbers: 8SW03051). Article 3 days, lens appear sometimes cannot telescopic situation, and the screen shows "zoom mistakes," the words. He that year August will question camera sent Fuji designated Shanghai acute digital technology Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as "Shanghai acute Angle) maintenance.
"After two months, I received the camera after finding remains a problem, they asked me again put the camera sent to Shanghai maintenance." WeiYuHui says, in the middle of October, camera back his hand, "this time the maintenance and replacement of the camera top cover component". After that, he released by Fuji company website camera performance fault firmware upgrade to inform, camera updated, "but there are still pixels highlights and serious, macro filming cannot focus or focus prohibit to wait for a problem."
Representations made, camera was again request sent to Japan detection. "Japanese Fuji film electronic image division, quality assurance department done detect the report has proved problem exists, test report also specify can't solve the problem." WeiYuHui said.
The end of December, 2010 Shanghai WeiYuHui received from acute letter: "you suggested going back to you for sending me the S1000 machine, we after many search, this machine has been unable to find S1000 camera. I direction you apologize."
"I found on the Internet and I do have a lot of consumer, they encountered and their contact decided to bring Fuji and related aspects together to court. Lawyer: camera title to consumer things happen, Fuji company and related aspects also took remedial measures. Issued by the Shanghai acute Angle in a letter, the reporter sees as follows words: "in order to guarantee that you can use in machine detecting during the camera, 2009 August 6, my company send you a S1000 follow-up type, type: S1500 (serial number: 9UW05378), as backup machine for you. Our staff by telephone, inform you have to change planes S1500 is using the disposal methods, but unfortunately you did not inform whether agree."
For the remedial measures and WeiYuHui said: "I didn't put forward this requirement, they put (spare machine) directly addressed to me. I wonder why don't give me S1000 models of spare machine." According to his introduction, Shanghai acute mailed to his S1500 camera "only for a LuoJi, even the lens cover all have no, now also is broken."
The daily economic news reporter call Fuji company Shanghai headquarters, wiring researchers said, related department manager in the company. As Fuji companies in China, Shanghai WeiXiuShang designated camera acute digital technology Co., LTD, legal representative CengGuiBao when accepting a reporter to interview: "there is this matter, the lawyer will to conother things related arrangements." As for concrete circumstance and later plan, he says, "is now a lawsuit, to this thing no comment."
WeiYuHui free attorney, hubei better and more beautiful qiqi lawyer told reporters: "no matter what the problem is, that part a camera ownership belongs to consumers, the businessman has no right to make any treatment for a camera ownership, must be returned to the consumers. He stressed that, in this case, "the problem of the camera is the key evidence." In addition, the more beautiful qiqi said: "whether the defendant constitute a cover-up, misleading and fraud consumer behavior, believe the court will have fair judgement."
For Fuji under camera arise problems, a digital insiders told the daily economic news reporter: "and Canon, nikon, as Japanese brands such as SONY, compared to Fuji camera in market share and new product launch aspects to have the certain disparity." He says, Fuji camera relative business not outstanding, "probably with company's overall strategy transformation |
|
Author Resource:-
http://www.cheaponsale.com/ contain a great deal of information about magnetic name badges,paper lanterns wholesale,hooded fleece sweatshirt, welcome to visit!
|
By :
Jessie Stone
Submitted
2011-03-15 04:42:15 |
Article From Article Mayhem
 Ezine ready view |
|
|
|
Related Articles
|
|
|
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")