Could the transition to electronic medical records increase medical malpractice?
|
Slowly but at a pace consistent with such changes, the medical profession is going to
high tech health data bases. Regardless your medical background, where you resided at the time, your records are available to those who may need to treat you again. But doctor’s say all lis not well with the system.
The Rand Corporation researchers conducted a cohort study using data on hospital electronic health record (EHR) systems from 2003 and 2005, as well as publicly reported hospital quality data from 2004 and 2007. When a basic EHR system was available, they found a 2.6 percent improvement in the quality of care with patients with heart failure, but hospitals trying to adopt advanced EHR systems saw a one percent drop in quality for acute heart attack and a three percent decrease in care for heart failure patients.
Hospitals that were in the process of upgrading its EHR systems to more advanced ones, saw a 1.2 percent decrease in the quality of care for heart attack patients, and a 2.8 percent decrease in quality of care in heart failure patients.
Researchers found that hospitals that already had EHR systems in place appeared to perform better which could account for some of the findings. However, the researchers noted that measuring the success of such systems was problematic, and that better means of assessing how well the systems were performing needs to be developed.
EHR systems are comprised of patient electronic medical records. These records include: patient demographics, patient medical history, patient medications and allergies, and laboratory test results. Nurses and physicians can view any radiology images and vital signs that might be associated with a particular patient, also.
Approximately, savings of using EHR systems as opposed to standard, paper systems could be $23 billion per year for Medicare and #31 billion per year for private insurance companies. Electronic medical records could also help promote evidence-based medicine and increase record keeping and mobility. Some aspects of quality of care could be improved, as well. Using EHR systems could reduce medical errors.
However, EHR systems are very pricey; Systems cost between $550 and $6,000 per physician.
However, one of the reasons Americans pay so much for health care is because of the high
administrative costs associated with using standard, paper systems, so switching to EHR systems could save money in the long-run. Learning the new system can be time-consuming; many physicians feel that adopting a new EHR system actually reduces clinical productivity.
The Personal Injury Lawyer Raleigh NC law firm of HENSONFUERST one of the southeast’s.
Approximately, savings of using EHR systems as opposed to standard, paper systems could be $23 billion per year for Medicare and #31 billion per year for private insurance companies. Electronic medical records could also help promote evidence-based medicine and increase record keeping and mobility. Some aspects of quality of care could be improved, as well. Using EHR systems could reduce medical errors. |
|
Author Resource:-
Thousands of victims in North Carolina and throughout the southeast United States have
made the North Carolina Medical Malpractice Attorneys firm of HENSONFUERST their resource of choice when battling for victim’s rights in medical malpractice resulting in personal or wrongful death. HensonFuerst demands nothing less than the highest standard of fair and ethical treatment for all of our clients.
|
By :
Jack Authors
Submitted
2011-03-02 22:45:12 |
Article From Article Mayhem
 Ezine ready view |
|
|
|
Related Articles
|
|
|
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.articlemayhem.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")